Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mukesh Kumar Solanki vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7430 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Solanki Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabha Shanker Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and perused the record.
2. This is a thoroughly misconceived and ill-advised writ petition and learned counsel for petitioner could not assist the Court at all.
3. Petitioner is seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondent no. 3 to permit petitioner to operate his Saving Bank No. 4300 which has been ceased by investigating officer under the provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure. The said order has not been withdrawn by Competent Authority till date.
4. The writ petition, therefore, lacks merit. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mukesh Kumar Solanki vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Prabha Shanker Chaturvedi