Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mukesh Kumar Mittal vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 January, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20209 of 2020 Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Mittal Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Shri Rahul Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Gyanendra Srivastava, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondent no. 1.
The grievance of the petitioner is that his appeal under section 28-A(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning & Development Act, 1973 is pending adjudication before the Chairman, Aligarh Development Authority, Aligarh since January, 2020, which has not been disposed of till date.
Shri Srivastava and learned Standing Counsel assure that the appeal would be decided as expeditiously as possible.
This writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Chairman, Aligarh Development Authority, Aligarh to decide pending appeal by a reasoned speaking order, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within two months from the date of production of copy of this order, in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 7.1.2021 Amit Mishra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mukesh Kumar Mittal vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2021
Judges
  • Pankaj Naqvi
Advocates
  • Rahul Kumar Sharma