The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:
“I. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or such other writ order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit P4 & P5 and quash the same as illegal and without jurisdiction.
II. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or such other writ order or direction commanding the 2nd respondent to reassess the tax in the light of the dictum laid by this Hon'ble Court in Mini Dileep Vs. RTO [2013[3]KLT 97 as expeditiously as possible at any rate within a short time as stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.”
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the 2nd respondent, during the pendency of the writ petition has already finalized the proceedings passing order, though the copy is still to be served to the petitioner.
3. In the said circumstance, the second respondent is directed to serve a copy of the order to the petitioner forthwith, if the same is still to be communicated; upon which it will be open for the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy in accordance W.P.C. No. 23786 of 2014 -2-
with law before the appropriate authority. So as to enable the petitioner to pursue such exercise, coercive proceedings, if any shall be kept in abeyance for a period of one month.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the concerned respondent for further steps. The writ petition is dispose of.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
kp/-