This contempt of court case is filed alleging non- compliance of Annexure-A2 order. The Standing counsel appearing for the respondent had produced Ext.R2 (a) letter issued by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner intimating the decision with respect to shifting of the electric line in question, and requiring the petitioner to deposit the requisite expenses.
2. In view of Ext.R2 (a) letter this court is of the opinion that there is no violation of Annexure-A2 order. Learned counsel for the petitioner raised contention to the effect that it is not justifiable to insist upon the petitioner to make payment of the expenses required. However if the petitioner is aggrieved in any manner with respect to Ext.R2 (a) letter or with respect to the judgment or order passed in the review petition, his remedy lies elsewhere.
Con. Case (c) No.797/2014 -2-
3. Having considered compliance of Annexure-A2 order, this court is of the opinion that there is no necessity to proceed further in this contempt of court case. Accordingly this contempt of court case is hereby closed.
4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to pursue remedy if any available under law as mentioned above.
AMG Sd/-
C.K. ABDUL REHIM JUDGE True copy P.A. to Judge