Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mudit Dubey @ Chhotu vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|28 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 17
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2091 of 2016 Revisionist :- Mudit Dubey @ Chhotu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh-I,J.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is present.
None present from the side of O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 despite sufficient service.
It is contended by the learned counsel for the revisionist that taking into consideration the validity of marriage of the O.P. No.2 with the revisionist, wrong order has been passed of maintenance by the court below which needs to be set-aside.
List in the next cause list for final disposal on merits.
Order Date :- 28.2.2018 A. Mandhani
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mudit Dubey @ Chhotu vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2018
Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh I
Advocates
  • Mohd Samiuzzaman Khan