Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mubarak Abdul Rahman And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|21 March, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOS.44209-44212/2013 (GM–POLICE) BETWEEN 1. MUBARAK ABDUL RAHMAN AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O LATE MOIDOO, R/AT: "RASHAS" CHIRAKKARA POST, TELLICHERRY, KANNUR DISTRICT, KERALA-670 104.
2. ALIYARU SALAHUDDEEN KUNJU AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE ALIYAR KUNJU, R/AT: PALOOKKATHIL VARAVELA POST, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA REPRESENTED BY HIS G.P.A HOLDER MR. SHAJU HASSAN C.H.
S/O HASSAN KUNJU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
3. MRS. SAFIYA SALAHUDDEEN KUNJU AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O LATE ALIYARU SALAHUDEEN KUNJU R/AT: PALOOKKATHIL VARAVELA POST, KOLLAM DISTRICT,KERALA REPRESENTED BY HIS G.P.A HOLDER MR. SHAJU HASSAN C.H.
S/O HASSAN KUNJU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
4. SATISH ACHYUTH KINI AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, S/O LATE ACHYUT RAM KINI, R/AT P.O BOX 3402, AL KHOBAR 31952 SAUDI ARABIA PERMANENT ADDRESS AT:
B-302, MOTA MAHAL, LAKHANWALA COMPLEX, ANDHERI WEST, MUMBAI-400053. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI PAWAN KUMAR. M.N, ADVOCATE. FOR SRI REUBEN JACOB, ADVOCATE.) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BANGALORE CITY, INFANTRY ROAD, BANGALORE-560001.
3. CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT (CID) CID HEADQUARTERS’ CARLTON HOUSE #1, PALACE ROAD BANGALORE-560001 REPRESENTED BY DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (CID).
4. THE INSPECTOR & S.H.O KOTHANUR POLICE STATION, KOTHANUR, BANGALORE-560077. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NILOUFER AKBAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R4.) - - -
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THAT THE COMPLAINTS DATED 30.8.2013, 2.9.2013, 2.9.2013, 5.9.2013 AND 7.9.2013 VIDE ANN-L, M, N, P & Q FILED BY THE 1ST, 2ND, 3RD AND 4TH PETITIONERS RESPECTIVELY, BE ENTRUSTED TO AND INVESTIGATED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT CRIME INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT [C.I.D.] POLICE AND TO TAKE FURTHER ACTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW IN RESPECT OF THE SAID COMPLAINTS ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri.Pawan Kumar M.N., learned counsel for Sri.Reuben Jacob, learned counsel for the petitioners.
Smt. Niloufer Akbar, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE RV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mubarak Abdul Rahman And Others vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
21 March, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe
Advocates
  • Smt Niloufer Akbar