Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M.Sornam vs The Collector

Madras High Court|14 June, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 12.06.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter has been listed today under the caption ''for dismissal''. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
14.06.2017 Index:Yes/No raa/jer To
1. The Collector Salem District.
2. The Assistant Director of Panchayat Salem District.
3. The Executive Officer-cum-the BDO Thalaivasal Panchayat, Attur Taluk, Salem District.
4. The President Thalaivasal Panchayat, Attur Taluk, Salem District.
5. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras.
M.M. SUNDRESH, J.
raa/jer W.P.No.37232 of 2016 & W.M.P.No.38017 of 2016 14.06.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M.Sornam vs The Collector

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 June, 2017