Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M.S.Mohammed Younes vs Usmin

Madras High Court|13 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition has been filed by the petitioner to withdraw the case in M.C.No. 56/13 pending on the file of the CJM, Ramanathapuram and transfer the same to the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchengode.
2.Usmin got married to Mohammed Younes some time in the year 2010. Usmin hails from Ramanathapuram District, whereas Mohammed Younes is from Thiruchengode District. After marriage, Usmin was living in her matrimonial home in Thiruchengode District. Their marriage ran into rough weather resulting the spouses getting estranged. Usmin came back to her paternal home in Ramanathapuram District and filed M.C.No.56/2013 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram against Mohammed Younes under Section 125 Cr.P.C. claiming maintenance for herself and daughter Fareeja, for transferring, which, Mohammed Younes is before this Court.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
4. The learned counsel for Mohammed Younes submitted that the place of residence of Usmin is Thiruchengode and further she is presently working in Bangalore.
5. Per contra, the learned counsel for Usmin submitted that Usmin was born in Ramanathapuram District and after marriage, she was living in Thiruchengode District in her matrimonial home and that is why, the husband was able to have certain records to show that Usmin was a resident of Thiruchengode. After they were estranged, Usmin is back to her parental home and since Younes failed and neglected to maintain her and her daughter, she was constrained to file M.C.No.56/2013 as stated above.
6. This Court gave its anxious consideration to the rival submissions.
7. The evidence produced by the learned counsel for Mohammed Younes for Usmin is an ordinary resident of Thiruchengode, like voter identity card etc., only shows that during her matrimonial life those documents were obtained. As regards the contention of the learned counsel for Younes that Usmin is at present working in Bangalore, that cannot be a reason to transfer the maintenance case from Ramanathapuram District to Thiruchengode.
8. A petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., is maintainable in the local jurisdiction of the Magistrate, where the estranged wife ordinarily resides. In this case, Usmin, after her separation from Younes, ordinarily resides in Ramanathapuram District. That may be on account of her job, she was forced to stay at Bangalore. Therefore, the plea of Younes to transfer M.C.No.56/2013 from Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram to any Court in Thiruchengode District cannot be granted, especially, when Usmin has strong objections to it. It is the convenience of estranged wife that has to be looked into, while deciding the transfer application of this nature.
9. In the result, this criminal original petition is devoid of merits. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
To
1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramanathapuram
2.The Judicial Magistrate Thiruchengode. 
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M.S.Mohammed Younes vs Usmin

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 March, 2017