Mr.S.Gunasekaran, learned Counsel takes notice for the 1st respondent and Mr.Era Premnath, learned Government Advocate takes notice for the 2nd respondent. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to cancel the allotment of LCO in LCO No.49925 to the 3rd respondent, based on his representation dated 21.10.2016.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that though the petitioner has given a representation as early as on 21.10.2016, the 1st respondent has not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.S.Gunasekaran, learned Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submitted that the 1st respondent has not allotted the LCO to the 3rd respondent so far and therefore, the 1st respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2016 and pass orders in accordance with law.
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.10.2016 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.