Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Ms.A.Keerthi vs The District Revenue Officer

Madras High Court|28 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation dated 25.02.2017 made by the petitioner has been considered by the first respondent and has also produced the copy of the said proceeding dated 25.03.2017.
2. Recording the said statement, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.03.2017 Index:Yes/No raa
1.The District Revenue Officer, Chennai Metro Rail Limited, Unit II, Harini Towers, 2nd Floor, Land Acquisition Wing, No.7, Corn Smith Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai-600 086.
2.The Special Tahsildar(Land Acquisition), Chennai Metro Rail Limited, Unit II, Harini Towers, 2nd Floor, Land Acquisition Wing, No.7, Corn Smith Road, Gopalapuram, Chennai-600 086.
M.M.SUNDRESH, J.
raa W.P.No.4315 of 2017 28.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ms.A.Keerthi vs The District Revenue Officer

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 March, 2017