Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Mr.Moris Anthuvan Dhanaraj vs Smt.Amirthathammal

Madras High Court|16 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

It is represented that the matter has been settled between the parties and a joint memo of compromise to that effect has also been filed by the appellant and the respondents.
2. In view of the joint memo of compromise filed by the parties, the Appeal suit is disposed of. The joint memo of compromise shall form part of the judgment. No costs.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant has relied on a judgment in the case of Venkatachalam and others vs. Sengoda Gounder and others, reported in 2014 (6) CTC 216, and seeks for refund of the entire Court fee paid for which the learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. Accordingly, the entire court fee is directed to be refunded to the appellant. Connected MP closed.
16.03.2017 ga N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
ga Judgment in AS.No.857 of 2010 16.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr.Moris Anthuvan Dhanaraj vs Smt.Amirthathammal

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
16 March, 2017