The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P2 order of the Tribunal. The appeal before the Tribunal was with respect to the rejection of request for renewal of permit. The Tribunal found that primarily, the petitioner has not obtained a No Objection Certificate from the financier and that the applicant is not in possession of the vehicle, since the financier had repossessed the same, for reason of default committed in repayment of the hire purchase transaction. 2. The petitioner contends that, in fact, the financier had issued a No Objection Certificate as per Ext.P3 and in such circumstance, the renewal application could be considered afresh. It is to be noticed that if at all the petitioner had a contention that the financier had issued Ext.P3, then, immediately, the petitioner should have approached the Tribunal and sought for review of the order. The petitioner also ought to have impleaded the financier before the Tribunal; the omission is so doing, was specifically WPC.No.30291/2008 : 2 :
noticed by the Tribunal in Ext.P2 order. In any event, there would be no purpose in directing reconsideration at this point of time after more than six years from the date of expiry of the permit.
Writ petition hence would stand dismissed.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, jma Judge //true copy// P.A to Judge