Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

M.Ratheesh

High Court Of Kerala|11 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner is aggrieved with non-issuance of regular permit, granted by Ext.P3. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, pursuant to Ext.P3, petitioner preferred Ext.P4 application for grant of temporary permit, which is pending consideration before the Secretary/2nd respondent. The petitioner seeks disposal of application for temporary permit.
3. The learned Government Pleader submits that, there is no delay since the permit itself was granted in August and the 2nd respondent would definitely take some time for settlement of timings, after which alone the issue could be settled.
4. In such circumstances, if the 2nd respondent is not able W.P.(C) No.29744 of 2014 (P) 2 to finalise the timings within a period of three months from today, then, the temporary permit application shall be considered and temporary permit issued on the basis of the proposed timings, subject to the finalisation of the timings, in a properly scheduled conference.
The writ petition is disposed of.
AMV/11/11/ Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M.Ratheesh

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
11 November, 2014
Judges
  • K Vinod Chandran
Advocates
  • Sri Sajeev Kumar
  • K Gopal Sri