The review petitioner seeks a review of the judgment on the ground that the petitioner in fact had applied for the regular permit on 13.09.2013 and that the same was adjourned on 22.01.2014 despite it having been placed before the RTA. In such circumstance, the review petitioner submits that the regular permit application itself has been pending from 2013 onwards. However, it is to be noticed that this Court in the order did not deal with the date of filing of application, but only noticed the grant being in August, 2014. This Court also directed that the timings would be settled within three months and if no timings are settled within that period, the temporary permit application would be considered and issued on the basis of the proposed timings. RP No.987/2014 : 2 :
2. In such circumstance, there is no ground for the review of the aforesaid judgment, because there is no averments as to why the documents produced herein were not produced at that point of time. Evidently, it cannot be said that the documents could not be produced despite exercise of due diligence or that they were not available with the petitioner.
Review petition dismissed.
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge