Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Mr. P. Perumal vs Mr. T. Raju

Madras High Court|19 September, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This revision is preferred against concurrent judgments of the Courts below convicting the petitioner for offence u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentencing him to undergo 1 year S.I.
2. Respondent preferred a complaint informing that petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- from him and towards repayment thereof, issued a cheque bearing No.098548 dated 10.10.2008 drawn on Indian Overseas Bank (IOB), in such sum. When that cheque was presented for payment on 19.01.2009, the same was returned unpaid for the reason, "insufficient funds". Respondent/complainant had caused statutory notice and preferred a complaint in keeping with Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The same was taken on file in S.T.C.No.351 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Namakkal.
3. Before trial Court, complainant examined himself as sole witness and marked 7 exhibits. On the defence side, one witness was examined and no exhibits were marked.
4. On appreciation of materials before it, trial Court under judgment dated 28.04.2010, rendered a finding of conviction and sentenced the petitioner to undergo 1 year S.I. There against, the petitioner preferred C.A.32 of 2010 before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Namakkal and the same was dismissed under judgment dated 29.04.2011. Hence, this revision.
5. Heard Mr. C. D. Johnson, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner. There is no representation for respondent.
6. This Court is of the view that it will be appropriate to alter the sentence while affirming the conviction as this Court finds no reason to interfere with the finding of the Courts below. Hence, the finding of conviction for offence u/s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act shall stand confirmed. However, this Court would modify the sentence to one requiring the petitioner to effect payment in a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- in compensation to respondent within a period of six months from today in default, 1 year S.I.
7. This Criminal Revision is disposed of with the above directions.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mr. P. Perumal vs Mr. T. Raju

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
19 September, 2017