Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Moula Ali And Others vs State Of Karnataka Revenue And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NOs.3288/2018 & 11538-11546/2018 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN 1. MOULA ALI S/O LATE D.MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 48 YEARS, 2. MOHAMMED SHIRAJUDDIN S/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 38 YEARS 3. MOHAMMED GHOUSH S/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 41 YEARS, 4. ABDUL MAJID S/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 55 YEARS 5. ZEEBATHUNNISA D/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 65 YEARS 6. ZUBEDUNNISSA D/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 60 YEARS 7. BIBI AYSHA D/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 52 YEARS 8. FATHIMUNNISA D/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 45 YEARS 9. RAZIYA D/O LATE MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 37 YEARS 10. ABDUL WAZID S/O LATE D MOHAMMED FAKRUDDIN 67 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT BAGALUR VILLAGE JALAHOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI T A KARUMBAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING DR B R AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE 1 BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN K G ROAD, BANGALORE 1 4. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK, YELAHANKA (ADDL) BAGALORE -562101 5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR BAGALUR, JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK 562149 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPODENT TO CONSIDER ANNEXURE-E DTD:28.3.2011 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER AND TO PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS WITHIN A SPCIFIED PERIOD.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER In these writ petitions the petitioners are seeking a writ of mandamus to respondents to consider their request for reservation of 2 acres of land for the purpose of Madarasa and construction of Maszid. However, such kind of mandamus cannot be considered and it is for the respondent – State to take a decision in such matters in accordance with law. Hence, these writ petitions are rejected.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within two weeks from today Sd/- JUDGE nd/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Moula Ali And Others vs State Of Karnataka Revenue And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana