Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Moorti Devi Alias Mamkaur And Another vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 37
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42719 of 2018 Petitioner :- Moorti Devi Alias Mamkaur And Another Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner may implead the Gaon Sabha as a party in the writ petition during course of the day and serve a copy on the learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contends that when the application of the petitioners under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was dismissed, he filed a Revision and the Revisional Court has stated that orders on the stay application would be passed only after the receipt of the record and after hearing the other side. Learned counsel further submits that in the meantime on the basis of the entry which is there in favour of the respondents they would alienate the property in question.
Under such circumstances, it is being directed that the stay application would be decided within a period of one month from the next date fixed.
For a period of one month or till the decision of the stay application, whichever is earlier, no third party right shall be created.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 21.12.2018 Mohit Kushwaha
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Moorti Devi Alias Mamkaur And Another vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2018
Judges
  • Siddhartha Varma
Advocates
  • Mohit Kumar