This is also against the assessment by the same Wakf which is the writ petitioner in WP(C).No.23927 of 2013. The impugned orders are similar to the impugned orders in WP(C).No.23927 of 2013. In view of the discussions in the judgment in WP(C).No.23927 of 2013, I am of the view, the same would apply in this case also where the demand notices were issued without following the procedure as contemplated under the proviso to Section 72(6) of the Wakf Act, 1995. In view of the above, the impugned orders are set aside. The Chief Executive Officer is directed to follow the procedure under Section 72(6) of the Wakf Act and issue fresh demand notice in the light of the directions issued in the judgment in WP(C).No.23927 of 2013.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, (Judge) Kvs/-