IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.56373-377 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN 1. MONTE CARLO POWER PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.190, 1ST N BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORRE-560010, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
2. KALTRONIC OFFICE AUTOMATION AND NETWORKS (P) LTD NO.4/5, 1ST CROSS, NEHARUNAGAR, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 20, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
3. KALTRONIC OFFICE AUTOMATION AND NETWORKS (P) LTD NO.4/5, 1ST CROSS, NEHARUNAGAR, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560020, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
4. PARPIKALA POWER PRIVATE LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.190, 1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560010, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
5. PARPIKALA POWER PRIVATE LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO.190, 1ST BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALROE-560010, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
... PETITIONERS (By SRI. SATISH M.DODDAMANI, ADVOCATE ) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, VIKASA SOUDAH, BANGALORE-560001.
3. KARNATAKA RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT LIMITED NO.18, INA CROSS ROAD, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE, REP. BY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
... RESPONDENTS (By SRI.Y.D.HARSHA, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SMT.SHRIVIDYA ZIRALI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.S.SRIRANGA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FILED PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 4.12.2014 VIDE ANN-F ISSUED BY R-2, DIERCT THE RESPONDENTS TO EXTENT TIME FOR COMMISSIONING OF THE PROJECTS ALLOTTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER COMPANIES BY GRANTING 36 MONTHS FROM TODAY.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Sri. Sathish M.Doddamani, learned Counsel for the petitioners.
Sri.Y.D.Harsha, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Smt.Shrividya Zirali, learned counsel for respondent No.3.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, the matter is heard finally.
2. In these writ petition, petitioners, inter alia, seek quashment of order dated 4.12.2014.
3. When the matters were taken up today, learned counsel for the parties, jointly submit that the controversy involved in these instant writ petitions is covered by the order dated 19.08.2011 passed by a Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.29270/2010.
4. In view of aforesaid submission and for the reasons assigned by a Bench of this Court in the order dated 19.08.2011 passed in Writ Petition No.29270/2010, the impugned order dated 4.12.2014 is hereby quashed and the writ petitions are disposed of on same terms with similar directions.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case of the parties.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of.
sd/- JUDGE ln.