Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Mohmed vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|21 March, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This Application is filed by the applicant under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with CR No.I-3 of 2011 registered with Mangrol Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376, 466, 471, 465, 114 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Learned Counsel for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.
The advocate Mr.Amit Garchar who played more serious role was released by the Sessions Court. As per the statement of the victim also, all these documents were prepared by Mr.Amit Garchar and placed before the Notary and thereafter the documents were notarized.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record of the case and taking into consideration the facts of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant. This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Reported in [2011]1 SCC 694, wherein the Apex Court reiterated the law laid down by the Constitutional Bench in the case of Shri Gurubaksh Singh Sibbia & Ors. Reported in [1980]2 SCC 565.
In the event of arrest of the applicant in connection with CR No.I-3 of 2011 registered with Mangrol Police Station for the offences alleged against him, he shall be released on bail on executing a bond of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees ten thousand only] with one surety of the like amount on the following conditions that he shall:
a) co-operate with the investigation and make himself available whenever required;
b) remain present before the Investigating Officer, Mangrol Police Station on 28.3.2012 at 11.00 am.;
c) not hamper the investigation in any manner nor shall directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness so as to dissuade them for disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
d) at the time of execution of bond, he shall furnish his address to the Investigating Officer and the Court concerned and shall not change the residence till the final disposal of the case or till further orders;
e) not leave India without the permission of the Court and, if is holding a Passport, surrender the same before the trial Court immediately;
It would be open to the Investigating Officer to file an application for remand if he considers it proper and just; and the competent Court would decide it on merits.
At the trial, the Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
The applicant is permitted to obtain regular bail as per the established provision of law, within suitable time. Rule made absolute.
Direct service is permitted.
( M.D.Shah, J ) srilatha Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohmed vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
21 March, 2012