Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Wasiq vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3076 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mohd. Wasiq Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Pandey,Mohammad Khalid Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Alok Mishra Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri A.K.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner along with Sri Mohammad Khalid, learned standing counsel for respondent nos.1, 2 and 3 and Sri Alok Mishra for respondent nos.4 to 6.
The petitioner attained the age of superannuation on 31.8.2015. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that he has not been paid his retiral dues since then. In regard to the same he has moved a representation before respondent no.5 on 18.9.2019.
In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.5 to decide the representation of the petitioner in regard to his retiral dues in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 AKJ
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Wasiq vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Advocates
  • Himanshu Pandey Mohammad Khalid