Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Usman vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6027 of 2019 Petitioner :- Mohd. Usman Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Gupta,Prashant Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Awadhesh Kumar Saxena
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Rajiv Gupta, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent and Sri Awadhesh Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for respondent no. 3.
2. Dispute raised in this petition is with respect to demand of assessment raised by Assessing Authority on the allegation of electrical theft at the premises owned by petitioner.
3. Admittedly, against assessment order passed by Assessing Authority under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act, 2003), petitioner has statuary remedy of appeal under Section 127 of Act, 2003.
4. When questioned, learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute that the said order is appealable.
5. Dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 Manoj
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Usman vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Rajiv Gupta Prashant Rai