Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd. Usman vs The Joint Commissioner (Food) ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 August, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner would be met in case his Appeal No.C-201610000073 (Mohd. Usman Vs. State of U.P.) under Section 28 (3) of U.P. Essential Commodities Vitran Order, 2004 pending since 2016, is decided by the opposite party No.1 Joint Commissioner (Food), Lucknow Division, Lucknow, in a time bound manner to which, learned counsel for opposite parties have no objection.
In view of aforesaid, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation to the opposite party No.1 within a period of two weeks from today, annexing therewith a certified copy of this order as well as copy of the present writ petition along with annexures. In case such a representation is moved, the opposite party No.1 shall decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him after giving opportunity of hearing to respondents.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.8.2019 Rajneesh DR-PS) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd. Usman vs The Joint Commissioner (Food) ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 August, 2019
Judges
  • Vivek Chaudhary