Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd. Rashid vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|15 April, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the opposite party nos.1 to 3.
The punishment for the offences mentioned in the impugned F.I.R. is less than seven years.
Issuance of notice to the opposite party no.4 is dispensed with.
This petition seeks issuance of a direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 15.3.2021 registered as Case Crime/F.I.R. No. 049 of 2021 under Sections - 420, 406, 504, 506 I.P.C., police station- Alambagh, district Lucknow.
Learned Additional Government Advocate looking to the gravity of punishment being less than seven years has stated that the provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
The present petition deserves to be disposed of in terms of the statement made by learned A.G.A.
Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra).
Order Date :- 15.4.2021 mks
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd. Rashid vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
15 April, 2021
Judges
  • Attau Rahman Masoodi
  • Rajeev Singh