Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Raj vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46721 of 2021 Applicant :- Mohd. Raj Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Sunder Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No.502 of 2021, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Kotwali, District Fatehpur and is in jail since 6.8.2021, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.
A first information report dated 2.8.2021 was lodged under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 alleging that the applicant along with others formed a gang and have committed various offences.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of his involvement in four other criminal cases mentioned in gang chart, copy whereof has been annexed as Annexure-2 of the affidavit. He next submitted that the applicant has been granted bail in the criminal cases shown against him in the gang chart and as well as two other criminal cases apart from the cases mentioned in the gang chart. Copies of the bail orders have been annexed as Annexure Nos.3 to 8 of the affidavit accompanying this application, hence the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
The prayer for bail has been vehemently opposed by learned A.G.A. However he does not dispute the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in the case mentioned against him in the gang chart and as well as two other cases apart from the cases mentioned in the gang chart.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail during the pendency of the trial.
Let the applicant Mohd. Raj involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.
2. He will not tamper with the witnesses.
3. He will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.
It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by learned counsel for the applicant along with a self attested identity proof of the said persons (preferably Aadhar Card) mentioning the mobile number (s) to which the said Aadhar Card is linked before the concerned Court/Authority/Official.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 21.12.2021 Anil K. Sharma
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Raj vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 December, 2021
Judges
  • Mohd Aslam
Advocates
  • Shyam Sunder Mishra