Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Irfan Ali vs The State Of Telangana

High Court Of Telangana|06 October, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No. 28164 of 2014 BETWEEN Mohd. Irfan Ali AND ... PETITIONER The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary (Department of Revenue), A.P. Secretariat Building, Hyderabad and another.
...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Heard party in person and the learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents.
2. The prayer of the petitioner in the present writ petition is with respect to inaction of respondent No.1 in considering petitioner’s application, dated 16.09.2014, for extension of parole. It appears that prior to this writ petition, petitioner had approached this court in W.P.No.25031 of 2014 for consideration of his application, dated 16.08.2014, for extension of parole. The said writ petition was disposed of on 01.09.2014 by extending the parole till 15.09.2014 so as to enable respondent No.1 to consider and deal with petitioner’s representation for extension. Said order was further extended by another writ petition No.27200 of 2014, dated 15.09.2014 extending the time for parole upto 22.09.2014. In the meanwhile, petitioner filed an appeal viz., W.A.(SR).No.137044 of 2014 against the order of this court dated 01.09.2014 in W.P.No.25031 of 2014, referred to above. By order, dated 23.09.2014, the Division Bench of this court disposed of the said writ appeal with the following directions:
“It is now stated by the learned GP for Home that the Government of Telangana is yet to take a decision upon the petitioner’s representation. Extension of parole is sought by the petitioner on the ground that his wife has been diagnosed with Cancer and that there is no other family member available to take care of her except him.
In that view of the matter the parole granted to the petitioner shall stand extended till the disposal of his representation which is pending with the Government of Telangana. This extension shall however be subject to condition that the petitioner will not leave Hyderabad without the permission of this Court and will report to the Habeeb Nagar Police Station once in every week i.e., on Saturday, between 9-30 a.m. and 10-30 a.m. The petitioner shall also inform the Station House Officer, Habeeb Nagar Police Station as to the place of his residence.”
3. In view of the aforesaid directions granted by the Division Bench, no further orders are necessary in the present writ petition.
Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as unnecessary. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J October 7, 2014 Note: -
Furnish copy by 08.10.2014.
{B/o} LMV
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Irfan Ali vs The State Of Telangana

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
06 October, 2014
Judges
  • Vilas V Afzulpurkar