Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Ashad @ Munana vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 19316 of 2021 Applicant :- Mohd. Ashad @ Munana Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that accused applicant has not been arrested on the spot and his name has added in the statement of co-accused. On its basis he has been named in the FIR. Kasaim, the main accused who was arrested on spot has been enlarged on bail by this Court on 17.6.2021. The case of the accused applicant is on better footing than that of co-accused - Kasim. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the accused applicant. It is further contended that accused applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present. The applicant is in jail since 7.2.2021.
Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that co-accused has been arrested on the spot and beef and other materials have been recovered from his possession while the accused applicant succeeded in fleeing away from the spot.
Considering the rival contentions of the parties, the material on record as well as the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Dataram Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22, larger mandate of Article 21 of the constitution of India, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant- Mohd. Ashad @ Munana, involved in Case Crime No. 17 of 2021, under Section 3/5/8 Cow Slaughter Act., Police Station - Jahanganj, District - Farrukhabad, be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. In case the applicant is already on interim bail after submission of sureties, he is not required to surrender before the court below.
The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court/Authority/Jail Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
This bail order would be subject to the fulfilment of following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.
2. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
3. The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
4. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 27.7.2021 Arif
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Ashad @ Munana vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2021
Judges
  • Syed Aftab Husain Rizvi
Advocates
  • Raj Kumar Singh