Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Amir vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 22
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7812 of 2019 Applicant :- Mohd. Amir Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Arshad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
This bail application has been preferred by the accused- applicant, who is involved in Case Crime No. 14 of 2019 under Sections 2/3 U.P. Gangster Act and Anti Socialism Act, 1986 Police Station Civil Line, District Aligarh.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that three cases have been shown against the applicant in the gang chart, i.e., Case Crime No. 795 of 2018 under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C; Case Crime No.797 of 2018 under Section 379, 411; and Case Crime No. 803 of 2018 under Section 4/25 Arms Act. In all these three cases, the applicant has already been granted bail by the court below. Copy of the bail orders have been annexed as Annexure No.3 to the affidavit filed in support of the application. Further submission is that the applicant is not involved in case registered at Police Station Quarsi, District Aligarh as Case Crime No. 1057 of 2017 under Section 452, 506 I.P.C. and 7/8 POCSO Act, but in that case, some other person of similar name is involved. The applicant is neither the leader nor member of the gang but he has been falsely implicated under Gangster Act. He is in jail since 15.1.2019 and if he is granted liberty, he will not misuse the same.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.
Let the applicant Mohd. Amir involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.
2. He shall cooperate in the trial bonafidely without seeking adjournments.
3. He shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.
Order Date :- 29.5.2019 Ram Murti
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Amir vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 May, 2019
Judges
  • Umesh Kumar
Advocates
  • Mohd Arshad