Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mohd Akram vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23989 of 2020 Petitioner :- Mohd. Akram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushal Kishore Mani
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Deepak Kumar Srivastava, does not dispute the submission of learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 for redressal of his grievance enumerated in the writ petition.
He does not press the relief sought in the writ petition and recasts his prayer. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the competent authority/ court under the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
It is always open to the petitioner to avail lawful remedies. The writ petition is disposed of.
Sri Kaushal Kishore Mani, learned counsel for gaon sabha is present.
Order Date :- 24.8.2021 Nadeem Ahmad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohd Akram vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 August, 2021
Judges
  • Ajay Bhanot
Advocates
  • Deepak Kumar Srivastava