Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mohan Shyam Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24560 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mohan Shyam Sharma Respondent :- State Of U P And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
Petitioner had purchased a house in which there are tenants. Petitioner has made a representation to the S.S.P., Mathura that the house be got vacated from the said tenants.
The petitioner has now filed this writ petition for a direction upon the S.S.P. to decide his aforesaid representation.
The decision of the aforesaid representation would serve no purpose inasmuch as the S.S.P. has no power in law to dispossess the occupants of the house much less the tenants. The petitioner has to take recourse to the civil remedies for the dispossession of the tenants from the house in dispute.
In view of the above, we are of the opinion that the writ petition is misconceived and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.7.2018 Nirmal Sinha
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohan Shyam Sharma vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 July, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Kamlesh Tiwari