This writ petition arises out of the proceedings under section 34 of the Land Revenue Act. All the three courts below have decided against the petitioner.
The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioenr is that the petitioner was not afforded adequate opportunity of hearing.
The revisional court has recorded a categorical finding that the notices were sent to the petitioner, and when he did not appear even thereafter, notices were served by way of publication. In view of the same, the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner regarding lack of opportunity of hearing, as also for adducing the evidence, is not tenable.
In view of the above, the impugned orders require no interference. The writ petition lacks merits and is dismissed.
However, it is always open to the petitioner to file suit to establish his rights, if any.
Order Date :- 10.2.2014 sks-grade iv