Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohan G And Others vs Aeronautical Development Agency

High Court Of Karnataka|10 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.51699 OF 2019 (S-REG) BETWEEN 1. MOHAN G, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O GOVINDACHAR, RESIDING AT VINAYAKANAGAR, BWSSB ROAD, NEAR KSRTC DEPOT, KANAKAPURA TOWN-562117 2. VIJAY KUMAR K N, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O NAGAIAH, AMBEDKAR NAGAR MYSORE ROAD, KANAKAPURA TOWN POST, TALUK, RAMNAGARA DISTRICT-562117.
3. RAGHU B P, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O NARAYANA, RESIDING AT 10 BTREET, 1ST MAIN, NEW GUDDADAHALLI, MYSURU ROAD, BANGALORE-560026 4. CHANDRASHEKAR H S, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, S/O SHAMBULINGAPPA, RESIDING AT 700, HEGGUR VILLAGE, HEGGUR POST, BANNUR HOBLI, NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE-571101.
5. MOHANA G, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O D GOVINDA SWAMY, VINAYAKA NAGAR, 2ND CROSS, BWSSB ROAD, KANAKAPURA TOWN, RAMANGARA DISTRICT-560117.
6. CHETAN C N, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O B RAMU, RESIDING AT 75, 13TH MAIN ROAD, RAGAVENDAR BLOCK, SRINAGAR, BANGALORE-560050.
7. MUNWAR BASHA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O KALESAB, RESIDING AT 428, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, YALLACHENAHALLI, J.P.NAGAR, KANAKANAGARA, BANGALORE-560078.
8. KARTHIK D, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, S/O E DHANA SINGA, RESIDING AT 127, VASANTA NAGAR, BEML NAGAR POST, KGF-563115. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI SAMARTH PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND AERONAUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, POST BOX NO.1718, VIMANAPURA POST, BANGALORE-560017, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR. … RESPONDENT (BY SRI C SHASHIKANTHA, CGC) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION 04.07.2017 NUMBERED NIL (ANNX-E) AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The short grievance of the petitioners is against non- consideration of their representation dated 4.7.2017, a copy whereof is at Annexure – E wherein they have sought for regularization of their services and the grant of consequential benefits.
2. Learned ASG Sri.C.Shashikantha having accepted notice, for the respondents fairly submits that there is no difficulty for consideration of the subject representation in accordance with law if a time frame is prescribed by this court and also if the petitioners co-operate by furnishing necessary information/documents as may be solicited.
In the above circumstances, this Writ Petition is disposed off directing the respondents to consider petitioners’ representation within a period of three months, in accordance with law and inform the result of such consideration individually to all the petitioners immediately.
It is open to the respondents to solicit any information or documents from the petitioners as are required for effective consideration of the said representation; However, in the guise of such solicitation, delay shall not be brooked.
No costs.
cbc Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohan G And Others vs Aeronautical Development Agency

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
10 December, 2019
Judges
  • Krishna S Dixit