IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.9600 OF 2017 (GM-POLICE) & WRIT PETITION NO. 9798 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
1. MOHAMMED SHERIFF, S/O MOHAMMED GOSH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS.
2. ZARINA BEGUM, W/O MOHAMMED SHARIF, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
BOTH ARE R/A NO.18-B, ANJANYA TEMPLE ROAD, J C NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 006.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE – ABSENT) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECCRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE-01.
2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J C NAGAR POLICE STATION, J C NAGAR, BANGALORE-560006 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE-01.
4. MOHAMMED AFSAR, S/O MOHAMMED SHARIF, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS.
5. ASRA FATHIMA, W/O MOHAMMED AFSAR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.
R4 AND R5 ARE R/A NO.18-B, ANJANYA TEMPLE ROAD, J C NAGAR, BENGALURU-560006.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, AGA FOR R1-R3, R4 AND R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT TO THE R-1 & 2 TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION PURSUANT TO THE NCR DTD:17.1.2017 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R None for the petitioners. Sri. Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
2. In these petitions, petitioners inter alia have prayed for the following relief:
“Issue directions to the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the complaint filed by the petitioners and to take appropriate action pursuant to the NCR dated 17.01.2017 produced at Annexure-F by issuing a writ of mandamus.”
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that in pursuance of the complaint lodged by the petitioners, FIR has been lodged against their inquests and thereafter charge sheet is also filed. Therefore nothing survives for consideration in these petitions.
4. The aforesaid submission is taken on record.
Accordingly writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE RD