IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT WRIT PETITION NOS.53194-53197 OF 2014 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
1. MR MOHAMMED RUMAN S/O MOHAMMED YAKOOB, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, R/AT NO.61/3,ANJANAPPA LANE, OLD PENSION MOHALLA, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU-560 018.
2. MRS UMME RUMAN A S D/O SHAIK ABOOBAKAR SIDDIQ, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.39/1,1ST MAIN,18TH CROSS, BEHIND SARASWATHI SCHOOL, BAPUJINAGAR, MYSORE ROAD, BENAGALURU-560 026.
3. MRS SHABNAM SABA D/O MAHMOOD H S, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT 639,K M STREET, CHANNAPATNA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT-562 160.
4. MRS SHAISTHA BANU D/O AJAZ AHMED, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/AT NO.34,8TH B MAIN, NEW GURUPANPALYA, BENGALURU-560 029.
(BY SRI.ANANDA K, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONERS AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF AYUSH, DHANWANTRI ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.
3. THE GOVERNMENT UNANI MEDICAL COLLEGE SIDDAIAH PURANIK ROAD, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURE-560 079, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL.
4. THE RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES, JAYANAGARA 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 041, REPRESENTED BY REGISTRAR.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR R1 TO R3 SRI.N.K.RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DT.11.11.14, ISSUED BY THE R2 TO THE 1ST PETITIONER AT ANN-H1 AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R It is submitted at the Bar that all the petitioners herein having already completed the course, no purpose would be served by keeping these Writ Petitions pending and therefore, no action need be taken pursuant to the impugned notices all dated 11.11.2014 at Annexures-H1 to H4.
2. In the above circumstances, these Writ Petitions are disposed off with the observations that the petitioners would not be put to prejudice by virtue of impugned notices, if they otherwise have accomplished their Course.
It is needless to mention that this judgment is not intended to be a precedent or parity for others to claim the similar benefit, now granted to the petitioners herein.
Prs* Sd/- JUDGE