Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohammed Kunhi G vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD W.P.H.C.NO.31 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED KUNHI.G, S/O. LATE. ABDUL KHADER, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/A 6-134/1, GALIMUKHA KARNOOR, NETTANIGEMUDNOOR VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT-574313. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. LETHIF.B, ADV.,) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY HOME SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT-575001.
3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PUTTUR RURAL POLICE STATION, SAMPYA, PUTTUR, D.K. DISTRICT-574231.
4. ABHISHEK, S/O. SHEKARAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/A: MANDEMBATTI, ADOOR VILLAGE, URDOOR POST, KASARGOD TALUK, KASARGOD DISTRICT-671543.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SANDESH.J.CHOUTA, AAG A/W SRI.S.V.GIRIDHAR, AGA) THIS WPHC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO SET AT LIBERTY AND PRODUCE THE DAUGHTER OF THE PETITIONER BEFORE THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ISSUE AN ORDER OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS.1 AND 2 TO INVESTIGATE THE CASE BY ANY OTHER SPECIAL AGENCY OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT, ABOUT THE CONSPIRACY OF THE 4TH RESPONDENT AND TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE 4TH RESPONDENT FORTHWITH.
THIS WPHC COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER This petition is filed by the petitioner – Mohammed Kunhi, who is the father of detenue Smt. Amana. It is his case that the 4th respondent has illegally kept her in detention. The detenue is produced before the court by Sri. Sakthivelu, PSI, Puttur Rural Police Station.
2. The detenue submits that she is aged about 24 years and she is married to respondent No.4 on her own volition, and is presently living with him.
3. In view of her submission made before the court, we do not find any reason to proceed further. The writ petition is disposed off accordingly.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE Np
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohammed Kunhi G vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 February, 2019
Judges
  • Ravi Malimath
  • B M Shyam Prasad