Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohammed Ayub And Others vs The Karnataka State Board Of Auqaf Wakf Board And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|07 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 07th DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 1903/2016 AND WRIT PETITION No. 2135/2016 (GM-WAKF) BETWEEN:
1. MOHAMMED AYUB S/O LATE ROUF SAB AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NEW PET, GOURIBIDANUR TOWN CHIKBALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN – 562101.
2. AZAM S/O LATE SHEIK AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NEWPET, GOURIBIDANUR TOWN CHIKBALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN – 562101. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GEORGE ANTHONY CRUZE, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF (WAKF BOARD) DARUL AWKAF NO. 6 CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU - 560052 REPTD BY ITS SECRETARY 2. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF (WAKF BOARD) DARUL AWKAF NO.6 CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU - 560052 3. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF (WAKF BOARD) DARUL AWKAF NO.6 CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU - 560052 4. THE DISTRICT WAKF OFFICER DISTRICT WAKF OFFICE, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN - 562101 5. THE PRESIDENT SHAH INAYATH MASJID & ALLIED INSTITUTIONS, JAMIA GAURIBIDANUR TOWN CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT PIN - 562101 6. THE SECRETARY SHAH INAYATH MASJID & ALLIED INSTITUTIONS JAMIA GAURIBIDANUR TOWN CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 562101 7. THE ELECTION OFFICER THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF AUQAF (WAKF BOARD) DARUL AWKAF NO.6 CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU – 560052 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. S.R.ANURADHA, ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WITH A PRAYER TO CALL FOR RELEVANT RECORDS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE R-1 PERTAINING TO THE ADMINISTRATION REPORTS OF THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF SHAH INAYATH MASJID AND HAMIA MASJID AND OTHER ALLIED INSTITUTIONS AND ALSO OTHER RELEVANT RECORDS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE R-2 TO 5.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that the petitions have become infructuous and therefore, the petitions be dismissed.
2. Memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
SD/- JUDGE KA/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohammed Ayub And Others vs The Karnataka State Board Of Auqaf Wakf Board And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
07 January, 2019
Judges
  • B M Shyam Prasad