IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.51768/2016 (GM – CPC) BETWEEN:
MOHAMMED ANWAR S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN SAHEB AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/O MAMBALLI VILLAGE AGARA HOBLI YELANDUR TALUK-571441 ... PETITIONER [BY SRI KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADV.] AND:
1. SHIVAMMA W/O LATE RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/O GUMBALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI YELANDUR TALUK-571441 2. NINGARAJU S/O LATE RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS R/O GUMBALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI YELANDUR TALUK-571441 3. NINGARAJAMMA D/O LATE SHAMBEGOWDA W/O DEVEGOWDA, MAJOR 4. SMT.CHANDRAMMA D/O LATE SHAMBEGOWDA W/O MARIGOWDA, MAJOR 5. SMT.RAJAMMA D/O LATE SHAMBEGOWDA W/O KEMPEGOWDA, MAJOR 6. SRI LINGEGOWDA S/O LATE SHAMBEGOWDA, MAJOR 7. SMT.VAJRAMMA D/O LATE SHAMBEGOWDA W/O MARIGOWDA, MAJOR RESPONDENTS 3 TO 7 ARE R/O GUMBALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI YELANDUR TALUK-571441 8. SAKAMMA SINCE DEAD BY HER LRS 8(a) ANAND S/O LATE SAKAMMA, MAJOR R/O HANUR VILLAGE, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571440 8(b) LAKSHMI D/O LATE SAKAMMA, MAJOR R/O HANUR VILLAGE, KOLLEGAL TALUK-571440 9. JAMIL AHMED S/O NASEER AHMED, MAJOR R/AT MAMBALLI VILLAGE AGARA HOBLI YELANDUR TALUK-571441 10. DUNDAMMA W/O LATE SHAMBEGOWDA MAJOR, R/O GUMBALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI YELANDUR TALUK-571441 …RESPONDENTS [R-1 & R-2 ARE SERVED;
R-3 TO R-10 NOTICE DISPENSED WITH.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 22.09.2016 IN O.S.NO.78/2007, PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) AND J.M.F.C., AT CHAMARAJANAGAR, ON THE MEMO DATED 20.09.2016, PRODUCED AT ANNX-E BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R This writ petition is filed against the order dated 22.09.2016 on the memo in O.S.No.78/2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge & CJM at Chamarajanagar ['Trial Court' for short].
2. It is discerned that the said O.S.No.78/2007 has been disposed of by the Trial Court and hence, writ petition does not survive for consideration.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.