Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Mohammad Shadab vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25509 of 2018 Applicant :- Mohammad Shadab Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Tyagi, counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No. 201 of 2018, u/s 363, 366, 376D IPC and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Kairana, District Shamli with the prayer for enlarging him on bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the victim is less than 16 years of age and she has levelled allegation of gang rape against the applicant, I do not find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail.
The bail application is, accordingly, rejected.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Dhirendra/
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohammad Shadab vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 August, 2018
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Pankaj Kumar Tyagi