Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2016
  6. /
  7. January

Mohammad Deen And Others vs Anand Kumar

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|01 March, 2016

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Rakesh Srivastava,J.
1. The delay in filing this appeal having been condoned vide order of date passed on Delay Condonation Application, let appeal be registered with regular number and old number shall also continue to be shown in bracket for finding out details of case, whenever required by parties with reference to either of the two numbers.
2. As requested by learned counsel for appellant, we proceed to hear appeal under Order 41 Rule 11 C.P.C.
3. Heard.
4. Admit.
5. Issue notice to sole respondent by registered post A.D. as well as Courier as approved by Office Memorandum dated 15.12.2015 under Order V, Rule 9 (3) C.P.C. returnable at an early date.
6. Call for the record of Court below.
7. Steps be taken within a week.
Order Date :- 1.3.2016 Pravin Court No. - 34 Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 296804 of 2008 In Case :- FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER DEFECTIVE No. - 1808 of 2008 Appellant :- Mohammad Deen And Others Respondent :- Anand Kumar Counsel for Appellant :- Mohd. Wasim Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Hon'ble Rakesh Srivastava,J.
1. Perused Office Report dated 29.02.2016. Service upon sole respondent is deemed sufficient.
2. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing appeal.
3. Heard.
4. Cause shown is sufficient.
5. Delay in filing appeal is hereby condoned.
6. This application, accordingly, stands allowed. Order Date :- 1.3.2016 Pravin
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohammad Deen And Others vs Anand Kumar

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
01 March, 2016
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
  • Rakesh Srivastava