Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Mohammad Akram @ Raje vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 August, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 31001 of 2019 Applicant :- Mohammad Akram @ Raje Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Praveen Kumar Singh,Syed Imran Ibrahim Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of impugned order dated 31.03.2014 passed by ACJM 2nd Varanasi whereby non bailable warrants have been issued against the applicants in Case No.4519 of 2017 (State vs. Huramat Ali and others) arising out of Case Crime No.177 of 1992, under sections 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Cantt., District- Varanasi.
Heard Shri H.B. Aushim Luthra, Advocate holding brief of Shri Praveen Kumar Singh, learned applicant's counsel as well as learned AGA and perused the record.
The Court does not see any illegality, impropriety and incorrectness in the impugned order under challenge and also there seem to be no abuse of court's process. There is no good ground to interfere in the same, therefore, the prayer for quashing of the impugned order is refused.
Applicant's counsel submits that as it is being desired by the accused to obtain bail after surrendering in the court below, a protective direction may be issued to the lower court to decide the proposed bail application.
In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in case after surrendering in the court below an application for bail is moved on behalf of the accused within ten days from today, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
In the aforesaid period or till the date of appearance of the accused in the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive measures shall be taken or given effect to.
It is made clear that if this order is not availed by the accused within stipulated period of time, no time extension application shall be entertained.
It is further clarified that the present order has been passed only with regard to the accused on behalf of whom this application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved in this Court.
With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 22.8.2019 shiv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mohammad Akram @ Raje vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 August, 2019
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Praveen Kumar Singh Syed Imran Ibrahim