Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Moghal Mohammed Baig vs The Controller Of Examinations

Madras High Court|27 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that due to subsequent developments nothing survives for further adjudication in this Writ Petition. Therefore, the Writ Petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.
2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the endorsement made, Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
27.03.2017 rna/rpa To
1. The Controller of Examinations, Bharathidasan University, Palkaliperur, Tiruchirappalli  620 024.
2. The Registrar (Incharge) Bharathidasan University, Palkaliperur, Tiruchirappalli  620 024.
3. The Syndicate Committee on Discipline, Rep.by its Chairman, Bharathidasan University, Palkaliperur, Tiruchirappalli  620 024.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J rna W.P.No.15243 of 2004 27.03.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Moghal Mohammed Baig vs The Controller Of Examinations

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
27 March, 2017