This writ petition is filed calling upon the respondents to take immediate action pursuant to Ext. P3 application submitted by the petitioner. 2. The facts involved in this case would disclose that the petitioner filed an application before the 1st respondent under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (for short “the Act”). Ext. P1 is the said application. The 1st respondent sent a reply Ext. P2 giving the information requested for. The petitioner, dissatisfied with the same, submitted another application on 11.6.2013 before the 2nd respondent seeking details regarding document No. 461/93 of Sub Registrar's Office, Alangad. According to the petitioner, the 2nd respondent gave an evasive reply in terms of Ext. P4. The petitioner preferred Ext. P5 appeal before the 1st respondent against Ext. P4. The petitioner was informed that the records will be available only in Paravur Block Office. Ext. P6 is the reply. The petitioner filed a suit O.S.No. 332/2008 before the Munsiff's Court, Parur in which the District Development Officer for Scheduled Castes as well as Block Scheduled Caste Development Officer have filed affidavit stating that the documents were not available.
W.P(C) No. 31037 of 2013 -: 2 :-
3. Petitioner preferred second appeal before the 3rd respondent. Ext. P9 is the said appeal. The 3rd respondent issued Ext. P10 directing the 1st respondent to give copy of the report regarding the appeal and to issue a copy to the petitioner on or before 3.10.2013. Petitioner challenges the aforesaid proceedings.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
5. Having regard to the averments in the writ petition, the petitioner has not ventilated any legal grievance in the matter. Ext. P10 order passed by the 3rd respondent is only calling for reports relating to the matter complained of. Being a statutory authority under the Act, it is for the said authority to pass final orders. There is no reason for this Court to interfere, when alternate remedy is available to the petitioner.
In the result, there being no basis for this writ petition, the same is dismissed.
Sd/- A.M. Shaffique, Judge.
Tds/