IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/17TH ASWINA, 1936 WP(C).No. 10333 of 2013 (N) ----------------------------
PETITIONER :
-----------------------
M.K.MOHAMED, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O.KOCHUMEETHIAN, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.GEORGE & SONS, MEERA MAHAL, MASTER COACHING BOARD, KALOOR, COCHIN-17.
BY ADVS.SRI.PULIKKOOL ABUBACKER SMT.SARITHA DAVID CHUNKATH SMT.P.A.ANEESHA SMT.N.A.NADEERA RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTERY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NORTH BLOCK, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI-110 001.
2. SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF ROAD- TRANSPORT & HIGH WAY, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, NO.1 PARLIAMENT STREET, NEW-DELHI-110 001.
3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.PIN-695 001 R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.N.NAGARESH,ASG OF INDIA R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.R.RANJITH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-10-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts WP(C).No. 10333 of 2013 (N) ----------------------------------------
APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS -------------------------------------
EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE COPY OF THE EUROPEAN WINDOW FILM ASSOCIATION (E W F A).
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P.(C) No.10333 of 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dated this the 09th day of October, 2014 J UD G M E N T The issue raised in the above writ petition is covered by a decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in Avishek Goenka v. Union of India [AIR 2012 SC 3230]. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner specifically urges that many important aspects have not been considered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The petitioner shall definitely be entitled to raise such contentions before the Hon'ble Supreme Court. But, however, this Court is bound by the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the writ petition is dismissed following the aforesaid judgment.
Sd/-
(K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge