Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

M.K.Geetha

High Court Of Kerala|26 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioner availed a loan of Rs.3,00,000/- (Rupees three lakhs only) for maintenance of her house, from the respondent Bank, on the strength of security interest created over the property in question. Since the repayment could not be effected as scheduled, the Bank proceeded with steps under the SARFAESI Act, which made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing this writ petition.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank submits that the 'total outstanding liability' as on date is nearly `2,51,366/- (Rupees two lakh fifty one thousand three hundred and sixty six only), out of which a sum of `80,270/- (Rupees eighty thousand two hundred and seventy only) is in respect of the defaulted instalments.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the default was never wilful, but because of some unforeseen circumstances and that steps are being taken, to have the 'overdue' amount cleared, for which some breathing time is sought for.
WP(c). No. 30715 of 2014 2 After hearing both the sides, the petitioner is directed to satisfy the 'overdue' amount in respect of defaulted instalments, by way of 'four' equal monthly instalments, the first of which shall be effected on or before the 15th of December, 2014, followed by similar installments, to be effected on or before the 15th of the succeeding months. This shall be in addition to the liability of the petitioner to clear the regular EMIs. Subject to this, the recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance, for the time being and the loan account will stand regularised. It is made clear that, if any single default is committed with regard to the satisfaction of the 'overdue' as above, or if any two consecutive defaults are made with regard to the regular monthly installments, it will be open for the respondent Bank to proceed with further steps for realization of the entire amount in lump, by pursuing such steps from the stage where it stands now.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
Pn
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M.K.Geetha

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
26 November, 2014
Judges
  • P R Ramachandra Menon
Advocates
  • R Sunil Kumar
  • Smt
  • A Salini Lal