Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

M.Kanniappan vs M/S. Metropolitan Transport ...

Madras High Court|28 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.
2. The petitioner joined the service as a Security Guard in the respondent Corporation on 19.02.1987 and he was promoted as Selection Grade Security Guard and retired from service on 31.03.2015 on attaining the age of superannuation. The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that though he has retired as early as on 31.03.2015, the retiral/terminal benefits such as surrender of earned leave 218 days and 29 days of medical leave amount of Rs.2,47,000/-, Erode Engineering College and Perundurai Medical College Refund amount of Rs.4,500/- and altogether a sum of Rs.2,51,500/- have not been settled. In this regard, the petitioner has also submitted a representation dated 20.02.2017 to the respondent and since no orders have been passed, he came forward to file the present writ petition.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that a similar issue arose for consideration before a Division Bench of this Court in WA[MD] No.383 to 457/2015 [K.Rajendran and others Vs. The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, Madurai Limited rep. by the Managing Director, Madurai-10 and others] and the Division Bench, vide judgment dated 12.06.2015, has ordered the amounts to be paid in twelve equal monthly instalments with an interest @ 6% per annum and also with a default interest and prays for similar orders.
4. Heard Mr.P.Kannan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/Transport Corporation.
5. This Court has taken into consideration the said judgment and also the stand of the respondents including the Administrative Department in its order dated 19.01.2017 made in WP.No.42555/2016 [A.Annamalai Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited, Salem and others] and issued necessary directions and for the purpose of disposal of the cases, it is relevant to extract the common judgment made in the above cited writ appeal :-
The learned Additional Advocate General submits that he has obtained written instructions vide letter No.7945/B/2015-2 dated 11/06/2015 that the terminal benefits of the appellants would be settled through twelve equal monthly installments, carrying interest of 6% p.a.
2. The said statement is thus taken on record and the respondents will be bound by the same. We have to keep in mind the judicial pronouncement of the Honourable Supreme Court in D.D.Tewari (D) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Utta Haryana Bujli Vitran Nigam Limited & Ors [2014 (e) scale -78] wherein it is held that in case of any delay in making the payment of the installments, the interest payable would become 18% p.a., for the delayed period apart from any other remedy which may be available to the appellants for non-compliance of undertaking given to this Court.
3. The instalments to be paid from July 2015 and each instalments should be paid on or before 7th of each month.
4. The Writ Appeals are disposed of accordingly. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
6. In the light of the above facts and circumstances, the respondent is directed to settle the retiral/terminal benefits to the petitioner in twelve equal monthly installments commencing from June 2017 bearing interest at the rate of 6% per annum and in the event of default, the interest payable will become 18% per annum. The respondent, apart from paying arrears of pension, shall also continue to pay the pension amount due and payable to the petitioner without any default.
7. This Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
28.02.2017 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No To The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation Ltd., No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai  600 002.
M.SATHYANARAYANAN, J., jvm W.P.No.4922 of 2017 28.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

M.Kanniappan vs M/S. Metropolitan Transport ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
28 February, 2017