Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mittha @ Vinit @ Prasant vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 864 of 2021 Revisionist :- Mittha @ Vinit @ Prasant (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Puneet Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
[Ref: Criminal Misc. Correction Application No.3 of 2021.]
Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
Correction application is allowed.
Learned counsel for the revisionist is permitted to make necessary correction in the application.
In the light of the submission made on behalf of counsel for the revisionist, the following correction is being incorporated in the order dated 20.09.2021 :-
"In the 11th line of second paragraph of the order, in place of '3 (1) (xv) SC/ST Act', it shall be read as '3 (1) (DH) SC/ST Act'."
Order Date :- 26.10.2021 shiv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mittha @ Vinit @ Prasant vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 October, 2021
Judges
  • Gautam Chowdhary
Advocates
  • Puneet Kumar Shukla