Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Mithlesh Kumar & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The case is taken up through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for petitioners undertakes that he shall remove the defects pointed out by the Registry within a period of ten days of the withdrawal of lock-down restrictions.
Heard learned counsel for petitioners, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for State Election Commission and learned Standing counsel for State-respondents.
By the present writ petition, petitioners have challenged the result of election for the post of Gram Pradhan.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, learned counsel for Election Commission and learned Standing Counsel raises a preliminary objection that petitioners have statutory alternative remedy to file an election petition against the result of election of Gram Pradhan under Section 12-C of U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947.
In view thereof, present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum by filing an election petition.
In case such an election petition is filed, the concerned tribunal is expected to consider and decide the same as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 31.5.2021/Shubhankar
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mithlesh Kumar & Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2021
Judges
  • Vivek Chaudhary