Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Mithaila vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|20 January, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. This Application has been preferred under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with the offence being CR No.III-705 of 2011 registered with Navsari Rural Police Station for the offences under Sections 66(1)(b), 65AE, 81, 116(2) of the Prohibition Act.
2. Heard Mr.Gajendra Baghel, learned advocate for the applicant. He has contended that looking to the date of arrest present applicant is in jail since long. He has contended that applicant will be avialble during the trial and he will not tamper with the evidence. He has prayed to release present applicant on bail.
3. Heard Mr. H.L.Jani, learned APP for the respondent State. He has contended that huge quantity of liquor is recovered from possession of the present applicant. He has contended that it is a serious offence. He has prayed not to release present applicant on bail.
4. From present applicant huge quantity of liquor is recovered, but looking to the probability of presence of the applicant at the time trial I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant.
5. Having heard the learned Counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, statement of the witnesses, gravity of the offence and quantum of punishment and the fact there is no definite allegation made against the applicant, I am inclined to grant bail to the applicant.
6. Considering the above, this Application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with CR No.III-705 of 2011 registered with Navsari Rural Police Station, Rajkot for the offence alleged against him in this Application on his executing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall-
a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;
b) not to try to tamper or pressurise the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;
c) maintain law and order and should cooperate the Investigating Officer;
d) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
e) mark presence before the concerned Police Station on every first day of the month between 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
f) not leave the country without the prior permission of the concerned Sessions Judge;
g) furnish the address of his residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
h) surrender his passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week.
7. If the breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned Sessions Judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
8. Bail before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the solvency certificate if prayed for.
9. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
(Z.K.SAIYED, J.) kks Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Mithaila vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
20 January, 2012