IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA W.P.No.9738/2019 (EDN – RES) BETWEEN :
MISS TWISHA A. SHETTY D/O Mr. AMARNATH SHETTY, AGED 25 YEARS, R/AT NO.902, SAI PALACE, BALLALBAGH, MANGALURU-575003 DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI V.LAKSHMI NARAYANA, SENIOR COUNSEL A/W SMT.ANUSHA L., ADV.) AND :
1. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560041 REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR.
2. REGISTRAR OF EVALUATION RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HELATH SCIENCES, 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560041 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI N.K.RAMESH, ADV.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR REVALUATION OF THE TWO SUBJECTS i.e., MICRO-BIOLOGY-I (Q.P. CODE 1083/MICRO-BIOLOGY-1, ANSWER BOOKLET NO.xxxxx042) AND MICRO-BIOLOGY-II (Q.P.CODE:1084/MICRO-BIOLOGY-2, ANSWER BOOKLET NO.xxxxxxx787), AND PATHOLOGY-I (Q.P.CODE:1081 /PATHOLOGY-1, ANSWER BOOKLET NO.xxxxxxx566) AND PATHOLOGY-II (Q.P.CODE:1082/PATHOLOGY-2, ANSWER BOOKLET NO.xxxxxxx832) IN PURSUANCE OF THE EXAMINATION HELD DURING SEPTEMBER, 2018 BASED ON JUDGMENT THIS HON'BLE COURT DATED 21.12.2018 IN W.P.Nos.48194-48198/2018 AS PER ANNEXURE-E AND EXTEND THE RELIEF OF REVALUATION TO THE PETITIONER IN THE ABOVE TWO PAPERS.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel Sri. N.K.Ramesh accepts notice for the respondents.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
Learned counsel for the parties submit ad idem that the subject matter of this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.48194- 198/2018 and allied matters disposed of on 21.12.2018 wherein a writ of mandamus has been issued to the respondent-University to send such of the answer papers of the petitioners, wherein the percentage difference amongst the valuations (two in the case of U.G. course and four in the case of P.G. course, as the case may be) in terms of 15.6.2012 Ordinance as worked out in paragraphs 25 and 26 therein, for third or fifth valuation, as the case may be, forthwith.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the subject matter of this writ petition being U.G course, the respondent-University shall send the answer papers of the petitioner in terms of the Ordinance dated 15.06.2012 as worked out in paragraph 25 of the order in the batch of writ petitions referred to above for third valuation, forthwith.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Dvr: