Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Miss Seema Nanda vs Union Of India And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|09 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION Nos.26964-26967 OF 2014 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
MISS SEEMA NANDA, AGED 55 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF A.C.NANDA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.302, J P REGENCY, 7/2, HARRIS ROAD, BENSON TOWN, BANGALORE – 560046 AND ALSO AT: D-703, SOM VIHAR, R.K.PURAM, NEW DELHI -22.
... PETITIONER (By Smt : SEEMA NANDA – PETITIONER (ABSENT) AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY, ANUSHAKTHI BHAVAN, C S M MARG, MUMBAI 400 039, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.
2. TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH (AN AUTONOMOUS INSTITUTION UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF ATOMIC ENERGY, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA), NATIONAL CENTRE OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA FOR NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS, NO.1, HOMI BHABA ROAD, COLABA, MUMBAI 400 005, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY & REGISTRAR 3. COUNCIL OF MANAGEMENT OF THE TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH , REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY AND REGISTRAR, NATIONAL CENTRE OF THE GOVERNEMNT OF INDIA OF NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS NO.1, HOMI BHABA ROAD, COLABA, MUMBAI - 400 005 STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.
4. DR S.BHATTACHARYA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER FORMER DIRECTOR, TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH NO.1, HOMI BHABA ROAD, COLABA, MUMBAI - 400 005. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 5. MR. MUSTANSIR BARMA, AGED 63 YEARS, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER CURRENT DIRECTOR TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH NO.1, HOMI BHABA ROAD, COLABA, MUMBAI - 400 005. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA 6. MR P N SRIKANTH, AGED 63 YEARS, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER FORMER DEAN, CENTRE FOR APPLICABLE MATHEMATICS SHARADANAGAR, CHIKKABOMMASANDRA, POST BOX NO.6503, G.K.V.K. P.O BANGALORE 560065, STATE OF KARNATAKA.
7. MR ADIMURTHI, AGED 62 YEARS, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH, CENTRE FOR APPLICABLE MATHEMATICS, SHARADANAGAR, CHIKKABOMMASANDRA, POST BOX NO.6503, G.K.V.K. P.O BANGALORE 560065 STATE OF KARNATAKA 8. MR G.D.V.GOWDA.
AGED 54 YEARS.
FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DEAN.
CENTRE FOR APPLICABLE MATHEMATICS, SHARADANAGAR, CHIKKABOMMASANDRA, POST BOX NO.6503, G.K.V.K. P.O BANGALORE 560065, STATE OF KARNATAKA.
9. MRS MYTHILY RAMASWAMY, AGED 60 YEARS, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER FORMER DEAN, TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR APPLICABLE MATHEMATICS SHARADANAGAR CHIKKABOMMASANDRA POST BOX NO.6503 G.K.V.K. P.O BANGALORE 560065 STATE OF KARNATAKA 10. MR T S VISHWANATHAN, AGED 63 YEARS, FATHER’S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER FORMER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR APPLICABLE MATHEMATICS, SHARADANAGAR, CHIKKABOMMASANDRA, POST BOX NO.6503, G.K.V.K. P.O BANGALORE 560065 STATE OF KARNATAKA 11. WOMENS CELL TATA INSTITUTE OF FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH NO.1, HOMI BHABA ROAD, COLABA, MUMBAI 400 005, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA REPRESENTED BY SHOBANA SHARMA.
... RESPONDENTS (By Sri : B C PRABHAKAR, ADV.FOR R2-R11(ABSENT) Sri : H.JAYAKARA SHETTY, CGC FOR R1) THESE WRIT PETITIONS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE ACTIONS OF THE RESPONDENT EXECUTED JOINTLY OR SEVERALLY AND REFFERED TO HEREIN SUPRA POST ISSUE OF THE LETTER OF APPOINTMENT DTD.28.4.2005 AS PER ANNEX-A BY THE R-2 THROUGH THE R-4 TO THE PETITIONER.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R None for petitioner.
2. Sri H.Jayakara Shetty, Central Government Counsel for respondent No.1.
3. Office order sheet shows that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 08.02.2019. This Court issued court notice to the petitioner on 27.02.2019. Even today, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner even though notice has been served to the petitioner.
4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petitions.
Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- JUDGE DKB
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Miss Seema Nanda vs Union Of India And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
09 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe